[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: SGML vs XML
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Simon North wrote: > Peter Flynn said: > > > When XML browsers eventually implement context-sensitive > > searching and all the linking goodies, we'll finally be back to where > > we were in 1994 :-) > > Ahhh, if ONLY that were true :-( ... sadly, XMLT(FO) is still a > looooooooooong way from getting to be even a feeble shadow of > what DSSSL nearly became. Yes, but implementing DSSSL would have been even worse, given the unmanageable syntax for newcomers. Fortunately, text-mode XSLT conversion to pdfLaTeX makes typographic production a snip. > I personally don't think we'll ever be able to catch up with where we > were back in 1994. So many babies have been thrown out with so > little bathwater .... architectural forms is just one victim. You can still use SGML... ///Peter
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|