[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Newbie

• From: Bob DuCharme <bob@u...>
• To: xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 12:58:39 -0400

>My principle in adopting terms from other languages has always
> been to stick as close to the original
>use as possible. It's a token of repsect, if nothing else.

>Besides, schemas is simply _wrong_.

I wholeheartedly agree with the first statement, despite the second
statement's contradiction of it. The "original use" is
http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/.

The first draft of the Schema spec actually used both forms. The WG made
their choice (I'll even take partial credit for them choosing "schemas"--see
my May 1999 comments on the first Working Draft at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/1999AprJun/0038.
html and search for "schemas") and they moved on, knowing that consistent
usage makes a document more professional (from an editorial point of view)
and easier to understand.

Bob DuCharme            www.snee.com/bob             <bob@
snee.com>      see http://www.snee.com/bob/xsltquickly for
info on new book "XSLT Quickly" from Manning Publications.

• References:
  • RE: Newbie
    • From: "Boyse, Jim" <Jim_Boyse@f...>
  • RE: Newbie
    • From: Peter Flynn <peter@s...>
  • RE: Newbie
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: [ANN] Topologi Schematron Validator - free Windows tool doesSchematron+XML Schemas
• Next by Date: Re: Newbie
• Previous by thread: RE: Newbie
• Next by thread: Re: Newbie
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread