[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XML Blueberry
At 06:55 22/06/2001, John Cowan wrote: >>But this new and incompatible version should be christened XML 1.01, or >>any other version number that reflects the evolution of XML. >><?xml version='1.01'?> isn't that bad, and it implies exactly what you say. > > >The Core WG has not yet decided whether changing the version number or >inventing some new kind of label is the Right Thing. > >Comments are solicited. I'm with others on this one: If it is decided that a change needs to be made, then surely the version number will be updated ... otherwise, why call it a "version number" at all? J ------------------------- James Robertson Step Two Designs Pty Ltd SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy Illumination: an out-of-the-box Intranet solution http://www.steptwo.com.au/ jamesr@s...
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|