[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Off-Topic: RE: A few things I noticed about w3c's xml-schema

• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: "B. Tommie Usdin" <btusdin@m...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 11:12:48 -0500

Which not only preserves technical options 
(it is useful to tweak an SGML Declaration) 
it keeps private consortia from owning 
public property. It's a big world but the 
choices can be too easily narrowed without 
regard to who chooses the choices.

Len 
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: B. Tommie Usdin [mailto:btusdin@m...]

SGML's child, XML, is certainly larger, louder, and more charismatic. 
But SGML is not dead.

• Prev by Date: RE: Copyrighting schemas, Hailstorm
• Next by Date: Re: Off-Topic: RE: A few things I noticed about w3c's xml-schema
• Previous by thread: Re: Off-Topic: RE: A few things I noticed about w3c's xml-schema
• Next by thread: Re: Word to XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread