[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: URI references [was: XML 1.0 Conformance Test Results

• From: Richard Tobin <richard@c...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 23:40:56 +0100 (BST)

> i had understood the file scheme to always require a host

Definitely not - RFC1738 says:

   As a special case, <host> can be the string "localhost" or the empty
   string; this is interpreted as `the machine from which the URL is
   being interpreted'.

It does not authorize omitting the // too as in file:/dev/null.  On
the other hand, the example you quote from the test suite uses it as
the system id for a notation, which is not required to be dereferenced
by the XML parser and whose use is implementation defined.  The same
goes for the use of "scheme:" and "d:", which appear in the system IDs
of unparsed entities.

-- Richard

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: URI references [was: XML 1.0 Conformance Test Results
    • From: james anderson <james.anderson@s...>

• References:
  • URI references [was: XML 1.0 Conformance Test Results
    • From: james anderson <james.anderson@s...>

• Prev by Date: Unrecognized encodings
• Next by Date: Re: Unrecognized encodings (was Re: XML 1.0 Conformance Test Resu lts)
• Previous by thread: URI references [was: XML 1.0 Conformance Test Results
• Next by thread: Re: URI references [was: XML 1.0 Conformance Test Results
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread