[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: XML 1.0 Conformance Test Results
Hi Richard, Thanks for the updated info. <snip> > >Canonical output mismatch between sun/valid/not-sa02.xml and > >sun/valid/out/not-sa02.xml > > and > > >Canonical output mismatch between sun/valid/sa02.xml and > >sun/valid/out/sa02.xml > > There has been some confusion about the validity of tokens separated > by character references to whitespace (which depends on the > definitions of Names and Nmtokens). In looking at the sun/valid/not-sa02.xml file, I can't find any tokens that that are separated _only_ by character references to whitespace. The most likely offender would appear to be: nmtokens = " this
 also gets  normalized " but there are literal spaces following the character references in each case. So it would appear I am not understanding the issue properly. Would you mind explaining in a little more detail for those of us that came in late... <g> why these documents are not in fact well-formed (or should that actually be not valid as you stated)? cheers, gary
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|