[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: WD-xmlschema-formal-20010320: "XML Schema: Formal Description "

• From: "Fuchs, Matthew" <matthew.fuchs@c...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 12:15:28 -0700

This bounced on round one.

Matthew

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Fuchs, Matthew 
> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 11:23 AM
> To: 'james.anderson@s...'; www-xml-schema-comments@w...;
> xml-dev@l...; www-xml-query-comments@w...
> Subject: RE: WD-xmlschema-formal-20010320: "XML Schema: Formal
> Description "
> 
> 
> The XML Schema formalization is an ongoing effort of the 
> Schema Working
> Group.  The March 20th document is the latest publicly 
> available version.
> Work continues, and so further working drafts will undoubtedly be made
> public.
> 
> The formal description is an effort that started after XML 
> Schema was fairly
> well developed -- XML Schema doesn't depend on the formal 
> description in any
> way.  On the contrary, the formal description is an attempt 
> to retroactively
> explicate Schema with a formal model.
> 
> Matthew
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: james anderson [mailto:james.anderson@s...]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 4:04 AM
> > To: www-xml-schema-comments@w...; xml-dev@l...;
> > www-xml-query-comments@w...
> > Subject: WD-xmlschema-formal-20010320: "XML Schema: Formal 
> > Description"
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > WD-query-datamodel-20010607 references this document.
> > REC-xmlschema-1-20010502 does not appear to.
> > 
> > Has the earlier formal description been superceded? By 
> > REC-xmlschema-1 itself?
> > 
> > ...
> > 
> 

• Prev by Date: Re: Define a root in a DTD
• Next by Date: Re: Define a root in a DTD
• Previous by thread: RE: MSXML Features (WAS RE: Steve Ballmer is cracking up)
• Next by thread: Is expat thread safe?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread