[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Picking the Tools

  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
  • Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 12:30:29 +0000

Re: Picking the Tools
On 21 May 2001 10:02:36 -0500, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> If one models at the level of UML, one should be able 
> to create both RDF and Topic Map instances of the UML 
> models.  Yes or no?
> 
> Given that we have XML Schemas, Topic Maps, RDF, and 
> so forth, isn't it prudent to work with an abstract 
> modeling technology such as UML over any of the above?

UML may be abstract, but it has roots in modeling methodologies I don't
find to be a good fit for XML.  XML documents aren't object-oriented
programs, whatever some people might think.



PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.