[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Types and Context
Sean McGrath wrote: > > [Jonathan Borden] > > >sure. what we still need is a processable incarnation of the "PSVI". no such > >thing exists today. > > Canonical Grove Representation. > > http://www.ornl.gov/sgml/wg8/docs/n1920/html/clause-A.4.5.html > as I said. I didn't say that one couldn't _ever_ provide access to the PSVI (of course one can do this), rather that the intended mechanisms to provide such access (e.g. DOM Level foo etc.) are not yet defined/implemented. -Jonathan
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|