[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: First Order Logic and Semantic Web RE: NPR, Godel, Semantic W eb
Okay, a fuse to allow breaking semantic loops should be implementable. Is there some way for the SW standards to enforce inclusion of fuses? If not, is there at least a way to provide some sort of library function and encourage implementors to use it? (I'm thinking in terms of certain RTOSs that provide system calls for drivers to check for deadlock on allocation requests. If the author of the driver fails to proper use the system deadlock check calls, you can still have allocation requests causing deadlock, but at least the RTOS vendor is providing the means and encouraging driver writers to use them.) Iwaku Len: > If a semantic service is considered a service, say > something at the end of a SOAP call, then you can > set the loop up as you wish. The ontology layer > looks straightforward. [clipped] > The web is an amplifier. Deal with it accordingly. Brings up another question. Has the SW team produced any concrete means of dealing with the authority issues? > Y'all can kick Gates and MS at will but my experience > is that they will do this as well or better than > anyone else. They have to sell a lot of copies of We all tend to avoid kicking the coyote without shin guards on. Full body armor is best, but it costs more than I got lying around. [clipped] ============================XML as Best Solution=== Joel Rees $B%j!<%9!!%8%g%(%k(B Media Fusion Co.,Ltd. $B3t<02q
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|