[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Picking the Tools -- Marrying processing models to data models
Simon St Laurent wrote: > > I still remember that peek(-16384) was the means of reading keystrokes > > on an Apple II, but I kept a reference card around for all the rest. and Al Snell replied: > Modern programming languages would read: > > #define KEYSTROKE_IOMAP_ADDR -16384 > > int getkey() { > return peek(KEYSTROKE_IOMAP_ADDR); > } > > for human consumption, but would actually store: > > pushl (-16384) > > for execution :-) Yeah, but not when compiling for an Apple II. Hmmm. Talking about indirection and things meant to be read by machines, . . . Joel Rees jreesmf@m...
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|