[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Picking the Tools -- Marrying processing models to data model s
See Groves. Nodes is nodes. The weeping starts with the names. Len http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti. Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Lowery [mailto:jlowery@s...] What would be of great benefit is if I could 1) have the objects internal data model made more obvious 2) have those constraints that can be written declaratively done so This is all just objects, done differently. I won't say 'refactored' because people will spit on me. But their are data models there, buried in all the class hierarchies ever written; don't lie to me and tell me they're not. And yes, there is one of them, albeit representable in a thousand different ways, one of the worst ones being through an OO langauge (as they currently are designed).
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|