[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: A few things I noticed about w3c's xml-schema
I have before. We are staring into UML, RDF, Topic Maps, XML Schemas, now add RDDL, TREX, RELAX, etc. It isn't that any tool or method alone is hard to grasp, it is the relationships among them and how to choose when one is best. In other words, if we dare to do less, we should use less maybe. But put it altogether and I think interoperability becomes a statistical guess. Too many casually aligned parts. Len http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti. Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h -----Original Message----- From: Steve Tinney [mailto:stinney@s...] On Wednesday 30 May 2001 11:15 am, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote: > meta-specs Could you elaborate?
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|