[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: [Xml-bin] :-(

• From: "Stephen D. Williams" <sdw@l...>
• To: xml-bin@w..., "xml-dev@l..." <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2001 16:52:17 -0400

"Al B. Snell" wrote:
> 
> http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2001/04/18/binaryXML.html
> 
> Didn't really capture our side of the argument, it seems...

Filtering out all opposing arguments as not worth printing seems a bit
unfair.  There's a lot of "kill the solution before it matures" going on
here.  On the other hand, I have no problem with people asking for
evidence that it's a better method.  It's just a hypothesis waiting to
be properly tested.  And no, my solution hasn't been tested yet.

No matter, the problem I'm solving isn't a figment of my imagination,
and my solution is rapidly graduating from that realm.  It may very well
be too expensive to be worth it in more cases than I hope, but I'm not
afraid to find out.


> ABS
> 
> --
>                                Alaric B. Snell
>  http://www.alaric-snell.com/  http://RFC.net/  http://www.warhead.org.uk/
>    Any sufficiently advanced technology can be emulated in software


sdw
-- 
sdw@l...  http://sdw.st
Stephen D. Williams
43392 Wayside Cir,Ashburn,VA 20147-4622 703-724-0118W 703-995-0407Fax 
Dec2000

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [Xml-bin] :-(
    • From: Matt Sergeant <matt@s...>
  • Re: [Xml-bin] :-(
    • From: Al Snell <alaric@a...>
  • RE: [Xml-bin] :-(
    • From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@i...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Transitive closure for XPath
• Next by Date: Re: atoms, molecules
• Previous by thread: [ANN] Charity XML Bookshop launched
• Next by thread: Re: [Xml-bin] :-(
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread