[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: "Binary XML" proposals
>Images have not traditionally been a >subject for markup. True, and they never will if you put it like this. >Why? Raster is already in its native >format. Yes and no. From what I've experienced it is very platform and OS dependent. To rephrase, if: You look at markup as a wrapper layer which shields its data content (in time). Then: Is anyone aware of approaches for raster graphics with an analog approach to XML?(general mechanism, platform and vendor neutral) This IPI, IPI-IIF (ISO/IEC 12087) stuff sounded to be along similar lines, "transparent data exchange" etc. I will check it out further. Jan
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|