[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: TREX and RELAX unite?
This comment needs clarification: "The main problem I have with it is it's too complicated," said James Clark, an XML expert in Bangkok, Thailand, who launched his own schema effort, called Trex, in December. "It's fine if you're a huge company like Microsoft [Corp.] or IBM. They can just add more developers." Is Clark comparing the developers of schema support tools (eg, schema engines) or authors of schemas? Presuming the former, from the perspective of tool users, is this as interesting an issue as the possibility of having several schema-type alternatives? Intertransformability will be the issue. It's ugly but it is a way to enable choice among technical means. Len http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti. Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h -----Original Message----- From: Michael Champion [mailto:mike.champion@s...] eWeek has an article about the W3C XML Schema complexity controversy at http://www.zdnet.com/eweek/stories/general/0,11011,2710691,00.html
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|