[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: performance test suite? (was: Re: Using W3C Regular Expressions)

• From: Danny Ayers <danny@p...>
• Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2001 01:52:28 +0600

You've all said it.
So slap the profile on the table, gents.

---
Danny Ayers
http://www.isacat.net

<- -----Original Message-----
<- From: Al B. Snell [mailto:alaric@a...]
<- Sent: 20 April 2001 22:16
<- To: James Strachan
<- Cc: The Deviants
<- Subject: Re: performance test suite? (was: Re: Using W3C Regular
<- Expressions)
<-
<-
<- On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, James Strachan wrote:
<-
<- > I've not managed to track the whole text-v-binary discussions
<- -  I find it
<- > hard to find the time to keep up with xml-dev these days :-(.
<- > Is your intention to build a performance testing framework to
<- demonstrate
<- > the performance difference of binary v. text XML parsers?
<-
<- Something like that. The Community is crying out for hard figures rather
<- than speculation, so when people's implementations are ready and tuned to
<- the hilt, I'd like to organise a race.
<-
<- For now, I'm collecting ideas on testing procedures that will ensure
<- fairness.
<-
<- > If so, I've been meaning to investigate the relative performances of a
<- > variety of SAX parsers (crimson, Xerces1/2, Aelfred), both
<- with and without
<- > validation along with some other configurations like turning
<- on and off of
<- > String "interning".
<-
<- Validation on and off - I forgot about that - another criteria for my
<- list :-)
<-
<- > It might be a good idea to combine our efforts into the same
<- benchmarking
<- > suite so (say) it would be easy to compare a binary SAX driver
<- fares against
<- > the best text SAX drivers etc.
<- >
<- > My idea was to create a SourceForge project for the benchmark suite.
<- > Does this seem of interest or am I way off where you're at?
<-
<- Oooh, that'd be sweet. The binary implementations aren't very ready yet,
<- but the testing tools will be useful for comparing different parsers for
<- now, and they can be designed to allow plugging in binary formats later
<- easily (this may come for free if they support multiple implementations
<- anyway)
<-
<- >
<- > James
<- >
<-
<- ABS
<-
<- --
<-                                Alaric B. Snell
<-  http://www.alaric-snell.com/  http://RFC.net/
http://www.warhead.org.uk/
   Any sufficiently advanced technology can be emulated in software


------------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org, an initiative of OASIS
<http://www.oasis-open.org>

The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/

To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
"unsubscribe" in the body to: xml-dev-request@l...

• References:
  • Re: performance test suite? (was: Re: Using W3C Regular Expressions)
    • From: "Al B. Snell" <alaric@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices
• Next by Date: Sample for C++ schema validation using MSXML 4
• Previous by thread: Re: performance test suite? (was: Re: Using W3C Regular Expressions)
• Next by thread: Re: performance test suite? (was: Re: Using W3C Regular Expressions)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread