[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: atoms, molecules

• From: Steve Rosenberry <steve.rosenberry@v...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 16:41:36 -0400

"Simon St.Laurent" wrote:

> It would also open up the prospect of treating other compounds - like the
> CSS style attribute, some of the path information in SVG, and various other
> places where the principle of one chunk, one string has been violated - as
> a set of atoms which could themselves be validated and/or transformed
> and/or typed.
> 
> This leads to another kinds of post-processing infoset, where the atoms are
> available as an ordered set of child nodes, but it seems like a promising road.


If I understand what Simon wishes to do, it is similar to what I wished
for in a late March post to this list and also in comments I made to W3C
requesting a regular expression syntax that allowed datatypes to be
defined as regular expression atoms.  The start of the thread can be
found at:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2001JanMar/0425.html


The thread continues in the April to June comments at:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2001AprJun/0008.html


My motivation was to specify an attribute as a numeric value with units
of measure attached to it for absolute clarity.  (Ask NASA how important
this might be.  They lost a Mars probe because numbers had no units
associated with it and one group assumed metric while the other group
was specifying English.)

Using a pattern restriction as a template to identify atoms of interest
within an attribute is similar to the ordering of elements in a
structure.  

Is it redundant?  Maybe.  

Is it "good" markup?  Probably not.  

Is it a useful, alternative way to specify information?  I believe so.  

Since the only guideline for when one should use attributes vs. elements
is "It depends upon the application.", I don't see this further
structuring, parsing, and use of attributes as fundamentally wrong given
that it has clear functionality for certain developers and users of XML.


-- 
Steve Rosenberry
Sr. Partner

Electronic Solutions Company -- For the Home of Integration
http://ElectronicSolutionsCo.com

http://BetterGoBids.com -- The Premier GoTo Bid Management Tool

(610) 670-1710

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: atoms, molecules
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • RE: atoms, molecules
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>

• References:
  • atoms, molecules
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• Prev by Date: Re: deterministic content model
• Next by Date: RE: W3C press release: comments on standard-setting
• Previous by thread: Re: atoms, molecules
• Next by thread: Re: atoms, molecules
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread