[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: "Binary XML" proposals

• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@e...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:15:19 -0400

> > conversely, I found XML-RPC to be about 3x slower than binary RPC.
> 
> A lot of that might be HTTP overhead :-)
> 
> Three-way handshake before you even send the request, the
> connection teardown? *retch*!

Yes. Also packet sizes are important for RPC... so even a
10% saving can result in substantial *practical* benefits.

I can't wait to see the first set of web-services appear...
many people will try to get good performance out of fine-grained
interfaces... and be surprised to find that performance is
terrible. Chit-chat combined with bloated messages are the 
death of distributed systems. 

It depends on the kind of data being sent/received of 
course... but in general, I've found that the lower down
the stack you go, the more sense binary formats make.

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: "Binary XML" proposals
    • From: Al Snell <alaric@a...>

• References:
  • RE: "Binary XML" proposals
    • From: Al Snell <alaric@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: "Binary XML" proposals
• Next by Date: Re: "Binary XML" proposals
• Previous by thread: Re: "Binary XML" proposals
• Next by thread: RE: "Binary XML" proposals
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread