[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Why XML Schema enforces UPA (was Re: a or b or both - mystery..)
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Henry S. Thompson wrote: > Neither of these is the reason it's there in XML Schema. It's there, > as its name in XML Schema, namely Unique Particle Attribution, > suggests, so _other_ aspects of the particles besides those involved > directly in validation can be relied on, e.g. annotations and > key/keyref/unique declarations. > > ht I think Henry Thompson knows my disagreement very well -- Unique Particle Attribution as in XML Schema is *very* restrictive -- Annotations and key/keyref/unique declarations require, if any, unambiguous grammars. I think we are *totally* screwing up document processing with these restrictions. I think we do not have an obvious solution here -- so we should work harder to get a solution, and not push forward one possible solution which has several negative points without analyzing all solutions. <warning>speaking for himself only</warning> regards - murali.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|