[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: PSVI
From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@c...> >I think to claim to do so would be at best misleading -- you _can't_ >assign types without knowing that higher (in the tree) type >assignments were correct, i.e. local validation and type-assigment go >hand in hand. Perhaps I've missed something. Are you saying that if there is a local declaration for an element (e.g. x:x/y ) but the validation for x:x fails (perhaps due a previous required element being missing) then y _must_ use any global declaration for y? That does not seem to be clear to me: is that the status quo? I thought one reason for the "no single element name with two types" rule was to overcome that, so that schema assessment of children could continue even in the event of failure of the parent to validate? Surprised, Tapei
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|