[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: advocating XML

• From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@h...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 09:00:30 -0500

Paul T wrote -

> ... both Templates and Generators *do*not* imply XSLT ( and XML )

 No argument here.  Actually, I did the work I described in my first post as
an experiment, but I'm pleased with the results.

>
> Remember Java? Remember these billions wasted into writing
> monsters in Java? Not that I have something against Java, but
> I started to like diversity ... and after the school of XSLT and SAX,
> I now write in RE as if I have XML - *that* really helps ;-)
>
>

> I think both are good things but both are
> not a solution 'as-is'.   And both are overhyped, I should say.
>
Hear, hear!

Cheers,

Tom P

• References:
  • Re: advocating XML
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
  • Re: advocating XML
    • From: Rob Andrews <randrews@p...>
  • Re: advocating XML
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@h...>
  • Re: advocating XML
    • From: Paul T <paul@p...>
  • Re: advocating XML
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@h...>
  • Re: advocating XML
    • From: Paul T <paul@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: advocating XML
• Next by Date: RE: Bad Business (was Re: advocating XML)
• Previous by thread: Re: advocating XML
• Next by thread: Re: advocating XML
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread