[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Personal reply to Edd Dumbill's XML Hack Article wrt W3C XML Schema
David wrote: > So because I chose to use UUIDs to identify a batch of transactions, your > receiver fails even though semantically I am correct. Doesn't sound like a > smart way to create interoperable systems. Neither ebXML or BizTalk mingle > timestamps and ids in such a fashion, and I don't see why anyone would want > to. In this case, the sender, who was the receiver's customer, was not willing to provide a creation-date-time field. Best regards, Bob <sig name = 'Bob Lyons' title = 'E-Commerce Consultant' company = 'Unidex, Inc.' phone = '+1-732-975-9877' email = 'boblyons@u...' url = 'http://www.unidex.com/' product = 'XML Convert: transforms flat files to XML and vice versa' />
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|