[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: attribute order (RE: Syntax Sugar and XML information models)
Gavin Thomas Nicol) > > Right, but if you view attributes at "attributes of a type", and > content as "attributes of a type" (syntactic sugar), we get into > a funky world where one asks why you can't specify the ordering > of attributes as you can content. This is kind of where the > SML folk were coming from. The question of "order" is separate from that of a "type". In relational databases, each returned row can be seen as an instance of a type (a la C. J. Date), but the components of that type form a set, not a list. Maybe you could view an element as being instances of two types at the same time: the type defined by the attribute set and the type defined by the non-attribute content. What a wierd thought! Cheers, Tom P
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|