[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] is that a fork in the road?
Wow. Catching up on a week of XML-Dev is difficult stuff. It feels to me like there's a lot percolating in this community right now, and it's not all friendly. About a year and a half ago, there was some bloodletting over folks who thought XML 1.0 itself was too complicated, and SML-DEV moved to its own turf. SML-DEV has produced some good stuff, but had to deal with being called 'splitters' on a regular basis. Now we've got a different situation, where 'XML' is growing complex more rapidly than most people speaking here seem to want. It's not exactly a matter of simplifying, but there are echoes of the previous battle. This time around, though, it seems like a lot more people are concerned about the complexity issues, perhaps because they've grown by an order of magnitude in the interim. I've never been certain that XML-Dev was representative of everyone using XML - I'm quite sure it's not - but it does include a wide variety of developer categories and people who have seen plenty of different projects and kinds of projects succeed and fail. I've also heard similar complaints echoing through other communities exploring XML, from XHTML folk to random people in bookstores trying to decide if US$50 for a 1200-page book is going to get them all they think they need. I don't really know what's going to happen, but I feel like we're at a crossroads, echoing the SML-DEV debate but with very different implications. I'm hoping that we can all find ways to use 'XML' so that it solves our problems without getting in the way of everyone else's problem-solving, but that doesn't seem to be what's happening right now. This chaos is probably good for the health of markup solutions in the long run - these are important issues that come up all the time. At the same time, I'm worried that users may start looking at XML with a lot more suspicion as the books grow in size, the learning curve climbs higher, and there doesn't seem to be much agreement about what 'XML' should be. To some extent, the same thing is happening with XSLT. Maybe I've just read too much of XML-Dev at one gulp, and I certainly come to this with my own strong set of opinions, but it feels like something different is afoot. Not necessarily the inevitable march of complex solutions to solve complex problems, either. Simon St.Laurent - Associate Editor, O'Reilly and Associates XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed. XHTML: Migrating Toward XML http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|