[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: CDATA sections in W3C XML Infoset
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, John Cowan wrote: > We are aware that DOM doesn't really match the Infoset. It was either > do it DOM's way from the beginning or give up on DOM compatibility. > We chose the latter. Yeah, that is basically the problem - that I can't describe a DOM using the definitions given in the Infoset. And I want to use the Infoset to describe the XML Script data model, but I have the implementors upstairs shouting at me... :) Are there many other changes that would have to be made to the Infoset to match the DOM? Because, bearing in mind that the Infoset is essentially just a dictionary, it seems a fairly small change to put the CDATA start/end definition back in as it doesn't really impact anywhere else. > > Is there any chance that CDATA section start/end markers could be put > > back in? > If you want this, file a comment at www-xml-infoset-comments@w.... My original mail was CC'ed to that address Cheers -- Richard Lanyon, Software Engineer DecisionSoft Ltd. Telephone: +44-1865-203192 http://www.decisionsoft.com "The medium is the message" -- Marshall McLuhan
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|