[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Masters (was RE: Personal reply)
Communicators negotiate that. We can provide a means to do that; we can't dictate the results. Politics is local. Walter is right. But commitment requires at least two: one to act and one to verify results of an action. We don't have to insist that schemas are the means. We have to insist means exist and that use of the means have predictable and verifiable results. So test on receipt or test on transmission. WAP tests on transmission so WAP agents, by prearranged agreement don't have to care. When do you commit and how? That is all you have to work out. Len http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti. Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h -----Original Message----- From: Simon St.Laurent [mailto:simonstl@s...] Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 2:03 PM To: XML DEV Subject: Masters (was RE: Personal reply) At 01:53 PM 3/12/01 -0600, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote: >`The question is,' said UserAgent, `which is to be master -- that's all.' Sure thing, Len. But who exactly is to be master? Senders? Recipients? Customers? Suppliers? Committees?
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|