[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: What can be changed, and what cannot? (was: Re: Request for a poll)

• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>,Michael Champion <mike.champion@s...>,xml-dev <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 10:42:45 -0600

To be fair, there were a number of comments about it 
getting too complex.  Even Paul Grosso posted an email 
mentioning that it was beyond a DTD plus more datatypes.
The response was the primer which did help some (me 
included) understand the thing.

You are right. The time for that debate is past.  The future 
is in the PSVI and the new recommendations.  Not surprisingly, 
that seemed to me to be what Henry was saying in his slides 
from his presentation.  Some may differ with what he has 
in mind, or others, but that is exactly the debate that 
should be held now.  Schemas are a done deal.

Len 
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Rick Jelliffe [mailto:ricko@a...]

From: Michael Champion <mike.champion@s...>

>What can be changed,

The use of PSVI in new recommendations. X* 1.1 and X* 2.0.

> what cannot, and

XML Schemas 1.0, because it has finished Last Call and all the reviews.

• Prev by Date: RE: Schemas and Semantics (was: A Personal Reply...)
• Next by Date: RE: A simple guy with a simple problem
• Previous by thread: ER schema language (was Re: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vsanarchy))
• Next by thread: RE: ER schema language (was Re: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy))
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread