[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: advocating XML Re: advocating XML Re:advocating
Rob, Perhaps your manager would accept a hybrid solution. We have developed a data description language called XDF (eXtensible Data Format). It lets you keep your data in delimited files (one can use any string for the delimiter), or use fixed-width format specifications, or use XML tags. The data are described fully in a separate (metadata) XDF document and links to the data are via non-parsed external entities. The XDF explains the dimensions of the data cube (axis information), column headers, units, notes, notes on individual items in the data, etc. There is an API which allows you to access the structures, arrays, or parameters; edit them, and write them out again while keeping the XDF document up to date. The API is implemented in Perl and Java (beta testing now). It is particularly useful for managing/interchanging large data sets when you want XML but don't want to bloat the data with tags because tranfer times are already nearly intolerable. http://tarantella.gsfc.nasa.gov/xml/XDF_home.html Ed Shaya Chief Scientist Astronomical Data Center/NASA ================================ >My (web) manager at work has asked me to convince him that XML and XHTML are >anything but a waste of time, and I have thus far not succeeded. He cares, >but only slightly, that XML can be used to separate data from its >presentation, and considers XHTML only pointless bloat that he feels won't >catch on. He feels that a comma-delimited file is better in every visible >way over XML for data storage, and is under the impression that XML has no >value. >Can anyone help me out a bit here? >Rob Andrews
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|