[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Request for a poll: (was RE: Datatypes vs anarchy)
> Perhaps what we need for a schema language is something along the lines of > <schema> > <conceptual-model> > ... > </conceptual-model> > <language-binding> > ... > </language-binding> > </schema> Not a bad idea... bind a taxonomy or ontology onto a language binding. It would take reasoning/arguing about intended semantics one level higher into the metaphysical instead of the merely physical. Of course, this is closely related to machine translation, etc.etc.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|