[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: The relentless march of abstraction (fwd)

• From: David Megginson <david@m...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 13:32:17 -0500

Tim Bray writes:
 > At 11:41 AM 27/02/01 -0500, David Megginson wrote:
 > 
 > >I think that client-side XML failed simply because it didn't fill a
 > >big enough real need (HTML 4 is close enough)
 > 
 > I have a problem with your verb tense.  The web is still too slow.
 > Fatter pipes aren't going to help.  The only way to make it fast
 > is to do some of the work on the (severely underemployed, these
 > days) client, and the only way to do that is to send some useful
 > data there to get chewed on.  So I think client-side XML just
 > hasn't got going yet.  To say it had failed, it would be 
 > necessary for it to have been tried. -Tim

Browsers that support XML + stylesheets (especially CSS) are available
on millions of desktops, both in the closed source world (MSIE) and in
the open-source world (Mozilla), and have been for a couple of years.
We can debate about particulars -- MSIE's support for XSL was pathetic
for a long time, Mozilla took its time making its DOM stable, etc. --
but that's splitting hairs: most specs' backers would have been
grateful for a tiny fraction of the exposure and implementation that
browser-side XML has already had.  If it's not flying yet, it's
probably not going to.

Note, however, that I have shifted from the phrase "client-side XML"
to the phrase "browser-side XML".  In fact, I do agree that
data-oriented XML (SOAP, RDF, or what-have-you) makes an awful lot of
sense for non-browser client-side applications, and my original choice
of words was a little misleading.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david@m...
           http://www.megginson.com/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: The relentless march of abstraction (fwd)
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin@k...>

• References:
  • Re: The relentless march of abstraction (fwd)
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • Re: The relentless march of abstraction (fwd)
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail
• Next by Date: Re: Why 90 percent of XML standards will fail
• Previous by thread: Re: The relentless march of abstraction (fwd)
• Next by thread: Re: The relentless march of abstraction (fwd)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread