[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Status of Data Islands

• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 13:29:41 -0600

Thank you, Jonathan.  I guess we will 
have to find out if the techique is still 
worth using/teaching (even if only MS implements it) 
depending on future support for it in MS 
products.

Len 
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Borden [mailto:jborden@m...]

    Modularization in XHTML has superceded the idea of embedding XML in an
<XML> tag. XHTML Basic 1.0 is the first W3C recommendation to make use of
Modularization. RDDL uses this technique of namespace qualification.

    You either care about validation or not. If so, <!ELEMENT XML #any> is a
weak excuse for validation, hence why not create a real XHTML Extension. If
you don't care about validation then stick whatever XML wherever you want in
the XHTML using whatever tag you please.

• Prev by Date: Re: SAX InputSource and character streams
• Next by Date: Re: Article (part of column) on XML & Semantics
• Previous by thread: Re: Status of Data Islands
• Next by thread: REMINDER: OASIS TC call for participation: Business Transactions
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread