[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: Registrars of terminology (was Re: Are we losing out because ofgramm

• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@h...>,"'xml-dev@l...'" <xml-dev@l...>
• Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 13:45:53 -0600

The definitions may need expansion as well, or deeper study 
on my part.  I note that an agency or agent is a human or 
organization.  Given what we are on about, it can be 
software.  I would classify that in terms of delegated authority.


Len Bullard
Intergraph Public Safety
clbullar@i...
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Arnold, Curt [mailto:Curt.Arnold@h...]
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 1:25 PM
To: 'xml-dev@l...'
Subject: RE: Registrars of terminology (was Re: Are we losing out
because of grammars?)


Any hint on how to provide feedback?  For example, the BSR schema attempts
to use illegal names such as "2.310" and "2.310.330.656" for element and
type names and a lot of the type attributes on
element definitions do not have an explicit namespace prefix resulting in
trying to find a "656" type in the schema for schemas, for example.

Doesn't seem quite ready for primetime.

• Prev by Date: Haiku (was Re: ANNOUNCE)
• Next by Date: Re: Registrars of terminology
• Previous by thread: RE: Registrars of terminology (was Re: Are we losing out because ofgrammars?)
• Next by thread: Re : Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schema ambiguit ydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4))
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread