[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0

• From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
• To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2001 16:43:53 -0500

Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:

> It would also have to cover any reuse of the reference if 
> entry to the site does not present the warning.  A 
> contract cannot be made ex post facto (my guess).  

But this is not a contract.  It is Sun stating
that it will not sue you as an infringer if you:
1) don't sue Sun, 2) feed back doco to W3C.


-- 
There is / one art             || John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
no more / no less              || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things             || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness           \\ -- Piet Hein

• References:
  • RE: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>

• Prev by Date: RE: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
• Next by Date: RE: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
• Previous by thread: RE: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
• Next by thread: RE: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread