[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
Daniel Veillard wrote: > > I will just note that exhibiting prior art is not sufficient. > You also need some legal action to take place before getting a > patent removed, right ? (I would be soooo happy if I was wrong !) That's not the point. It is one thing to issue a statement to the effect that: "While we take no position on the validity of the claim, a member of the W3C has informed us that certain provisions of the XPointer specification fall under patent ..." It is entirely another thing to impose conditions on the mere reading of the XPointer specification which by the way is simply silly language that anyone who has ever been involved in the drafting of a software contract ought know is silly. -Jonathan
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|