[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Plan B+1 = Plan C+1
Sean B. Palmer wrote: > > > Remembering that my proposal is a melding of Jonathan and Tim's, I have > updated it to use a resource element instead of div:- > http://infomesh.net/xncl/ Sean, I can't connect to this, perhaps you've been /.'d ? :-) > I believe that the semantics of <link> are too well known and used to just > ignore, so we're going to have to keep them, surely (then HTML processors > can be modified). Basically, it's the same proposal, I just changed div to > xncl:resource :-) > Jonathan: maybe it would be better if you just made these changes to your > proposal for continuity, but I still don't like the fact that:- > a. You don't use the XHTML namespace Right, that's because I'm changing the DTD, so to be consistent to what we are proposing I'm using the namespace http://www.openhealth.org/XMLCatalog/ , and the document obtained by dereferencing this namespace URI is in fact an XML Namespace Catalog. It turns out that browsers ignore the html namespace. By creating a document using a namespace http://www.w3.org/tr/xhtml-basic I assume that the document 'conforms' to what is dereferenced at this namespace, namely the XHTML Basic 1.0 W3C REC. Since we are modifying this spec, we assign a new namespace no? > b. You don't use xhtml:type when you could do. > Easily fixable of course! I'm not understanding, what is "xhtml:type"? Jonathan
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|