[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?
Inga Eckermann wrote: > > Hello, > > I am new to this list and have read about you mentioning RELAX and TRX. > Why do I need these standards? On the RELAX-webpage is written: > > Compared with DTD(Document Type Definition), RELAX has new features: > > RELAX grammars are represented in the XML instance syntax > RELAX borrows rich datatypes of XML Schema Part 2 > RELAX is namespace-aware > > Is it not all included in Schemas as well? I can't answer for RELAX, but here are the areas I can think of where TREX allows things that are difficult or impossible with the W3C's schema language: 1. Attributes In TREX, attributes are integrated into content models so that you can specify, for example, that an element must have either attribute X or attribute Y, or that it must have either attribute X or child element Y. 2. Wildcards In TREX, you can specify a content model even when you use a wildcard for the name of an element. One example of where this is necessary is for literal result elements in XSLT. An element such as xsl:if can contain, in addition to elements from the XSL namespace, literal result elements, which are elements not from the XSL namespace; however, the content of such literal result elements is subject to the same constraints as the content of an element such as xsl:if. Another example of where this is necessary is with XLink. 3. Mixed content TREX imposes no restrictions on where the equivalent of #PCDATA can be used in a content model. So, for example, it is possible accurately to describe the OBJECT element in HTML (in which the PARAM elements should precede other content). 4. Unordered content The W3C's schema language has an "all" operator but it has severe restrictions. TREX provides an "interleave" without any restrictions. 5. Intersection TREX supports an intersection operator (called "concur"). This can be used to implement exclusions (as in SGML). 6. Ambiguity TREX has no restrictions on determinism/lookahead/ambiguity. Have I left anything out? However, I think a more important issue is how simple and easy to understand the languages and their specifications are, but this is hard to measure objectively. James
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|