[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Plan B+1 = Plan C+1
Remembering that my proposal is a melding of Jonathan and Tim's, I have updated it to use a resource element instead of div:- http://infomesh.net/xncl/ I believe that the semantics of <link> are too well known and used to just ignore, so we're going to have to keep them, surely (then HTML processors can be modified). Basically, it's the same proposal, I just changed div to xncl:resource :-) Jonathan: maybe it would be better if you just made these changes to your proposal for continuity, but I still don't like the fact that:- a. You don't use the XHTML namespace b. You don't use xhtml:type when you could do. Easily fixable of course! Very good efforts everyone, Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer http://infomesh.net/sbp/ http://www.w3.org/WAI/ [ERT/GL/PF] "Perhaps, but let's not get bogged down in semantics." - Homer J. Simpson, BABF07.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|