[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] RE: Resource gloss
Jonathan Borden wrote, > We might slightly play down the dependency on XML Namespaces, > what we really are describing are resource directories Agreed. > the interest being as direct as possible does anyone have a > serious opposition to: > > Resource Directory Description It's not a Resource Directory _Description_. It's a Resource Directory ... period. Unfortunately RD invites the addition of an F (for format or file) which would be nastily overloaded. So I propose sticking an 'Associated' on the front, Associated Resource Directory (ARD) Associated Resource Directory Format/File (ARDF) And not an 'X' or an 'L' in sight ;-) Cheers, Miles -- Miles Sabin InterX Internet Systems Architect 5/6 Glenthorne Mews +44 (0)20 8817 4030 London, W6 0LJ, England msabin@i... http://www.interx.com/
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|