[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Namespace related-resource bundles: just the one?
> Again, I think that the existing proposals govern the remote > data format, and that this should be separated from > implementation within processors. I agree. However, as none of the proposals define methods for implementations, and no doubt will not at any time do so, I believe that the development of them can continue unhampered. Looking at the XHTML Modularization specification, it appears we are producing an "XHTML Integration Set" here. Kindest Regards, Sean B. Palmer http://infomesh.net/sbp/ http://www.w3.org/WAI/ [ERT/GL/PF] "Perhaps, but let's not get bogged down in semantics." - Homer J. Simpson, BABF07.
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|