[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit
At 10:24 10/01/2001 +0000, Henry S. Thompson wrote: >Quick followup -- I checked the XLink spec, and it's pretty clear that > >'role' is for properties of the target resource >'arcrole' is for properties of the target wrt to the link > >so my/Tim/Jason's proposal, that 'role' be the primary xlink attribute >we use to distinguish on rddl:resource from another, and 'arcrole' be >the secondary one, seems clearly preferrable to the status quo. I'm missing something here... To give an analogy, this seems to be like saying, when programming in C, struct { int a; int b; double c; } rddf; that the primary access to struct members should be by writing their datatype (int/double): rddf.double and that use of the member name (a/b/c) should only be used if necessary to disambiguate: rddf.int[sort=b]; -- Cheers, John
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|