[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
Dan Brickley wrote: > > On Sat, 27 Jan 2001, Eric van der Vlist wrote: > > For instance, despite many qualities, there are combinations that W3C > > XML Schema cannot describe and/or constrain. > > And that's no fault of the XML Schema language. Sure ! .../... > To overload Schema languages with > all this work is imho a mistake, since we risk confusion between > constraints from the core structures of an XML-based data format and the > (often tighter) constraints we wish to apply when using that data format > in practical applications. Same goes for RDF of course. Agreed. And that's why several specialized "schema" languages to describe the structure, the types, the rules and the semantic (with a framework to tie them together) would be quite good. Eric > Dan -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric van der Vlist Dyomedea http://dyomedea.com http://xmlfr.org http://4xt.org http://ducotede.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|