[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Patent controversy (was Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0)

• From: Edd Dumbill <edd@u...>
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 15:48:06 +0000

On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 06:47:44AM -0800, Dave Winer wrote:
> I came into this discussion in the middle. I want to know what happened so I
> can report it on Scripting News. This sounds like something people should
> know about. Can anyone provide a two or three sentence synopsis? Dave

You could do worse than Simon's XMLhack story on it:
http://xmlhack.com/read.php?item=985

And the previous story by Eric van der Vlist (bottom half of story)
http://xmlhack.com/read.php?item=946

-- Edd

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Patent controversy (was Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0)
    • From: Dave Winer <dave@u...>

• References:
  • RE: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
    • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
  • Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
    • From: Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@i...>
  • Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
  • Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@h...>
  • Patent controversy (was Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0)
    • From: Dave Winer <dave@u...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Lawyers. Re: XPointer and Sun patent
• Next by Date: Re: Turning off validation (was Re: Schemas and entities)
• Previous by thread: Re: Patent controversy (was Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0)
• Next by thread: Re: Patent controversy (was Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread