[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: local, global (was various ontology, RDF, topic maps)
> I'd like to suggest system three, where enough creative destruction goes on > to permit reinvention where necessary to provide efficient provision of > results - and I think that's pretty much what goes on in computing. Some > reinvention of the wheel, some learning about inventions. I can readily agree that system three is superior. I was more startled by Walter Perry's admiration of system one, and I didn't mean to imply that a completely sanitized system two was The Way. Perhaps my cultural bias against early America is showing through (mind, I'm much less disapproving of modern America). > Code bases > constantly change, though it may not be visible to users. And only > foundations (binary math?) are ever fixed in concrete. For me, ontology > can't begin to qualify as a foundation. Hmm, I sense this last statement goes off axis. To stretch the analogy quite thin, you can use ontology to find blueprints for the wheel you wish to avoid reinventing, or you can use it to put in place your shiny new Acme Wheel, Mark II. I don't think ontology per say has anything to do with preferences over re-use. -- Uche Ogbuji Principal Consultant uche.ogbuji@f... +1 303 583 9900 x 101 Fourthought, Inc. http://Fourthought.com 4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|