[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Schemata are not just constraints [was: "RDF + Topic Maps" = TheFutu

• From: Martin Bryan <mtbryan@s...>
• To: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 08:10:30 +0000

Uche

Glad you like what you saw when you read the Topic Maps spec.

> Not entirely true.  RDF recommends the use of human-readable "label" tags
> in schematics.  So at least the meta-meta data are described as you say,
> which is, I think the key part.

I've always seen RDF labels as serving the same purpose as Topic Map names:
shorthand identifiers of meaning. Its the difference between the term word
and phrase and its definition in a dictionary.

Martin

• References:
  • Re: Schemata are not just constraints [was: "RDF + Topic Maps" = TheFuture]
    • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>

• Prev by Date: RE: javadoc like?
• Next by Date: Re: Ontologies
• Previous by thread: Re: Schemata are not just constraints [was: "RDF + Topic Maps" = TheFuture]
• Next by thread: Ontology
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread