[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Academia needed the Web (Re: Success factors for the WebandSemanticW

• From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
• To: Andrew Layman <andrewl@m...>
• Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 11:25:34 -0700 (MST)

> Could someone please post an example of an RDF graph that cannot be
> represented in XML-RPC or SOAP serialization format?  That should settle the
> matter one way or the other.

It appears you decided not to read my post.  I'll help:

Uche Ogbuji:

> RDF is a directed graph.  There is _nothing_ to compare between RDF and
> foo serialization format.  RDF could be serialized to foo serialization
> format or foo serialization format could maybe represented by an RDF model,
> but they are orthogonal technologies.

So I never denied that an RDF graph could be represented by a
serialization format.  What I said was that the technologies had
orthogonal purpose.


-- 
Uche Ogbuji                               Principal Consultant
uche.ogbuji@f...               +1 303 583 9900 x 101
Fourthought, Inc.                         http://Fourthought.com
4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA
Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python

• Prev by Date: Re: RDF vs. SOAP serialization (oh yeah, and XMI and XTM)
• Next by Date: RE: RDF vs. SOAP serialization (oh yeah, and XMI and XTM)
• Previous by thread: RE: Academia needed the Web (Re: Success factors for the WebandSemanticWeb)
• Next by thread: Namespace Definitions: Cracks!
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread