[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Success factors for the Web and Semantic Web

  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@f...>
  • To: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@m...>
  • Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 16:11:23 -0700 (MST)

success factors of software engineering
> To me, TimBL's vision is clear but the process isn't. Let's clarify thet:
> There are just a few problems with the Semantic Web vision that need to be
> solved (not moaned at, or used as evidence to show how the SW will fail!):-
>
>      1. A Namespace is not definitive. Two different langauges point
>           to the same NS, but it has no Schema - which one is correct?

I don't know what this means.  What is this "language"?  Is it an XML
vocabulary/schema?  What is this "correct"?  Is it a matter of authority
to use a namespace?

>           (Action: make sure that namespaces are dereferencable)

Even more confused now.  How does making namespaces dereferencable solve
whatever problem obtains from having different languages reference a
single namespace?

>      2. A Namespace is still not definitive. Tim's example was of a URI
>           for Zip codes. There could be hundreds of them: no one is going
>           to use the same one!

I'm still not understanding you.

>      3. There is no current way to ascribe structure to extended RDF.
> (Action:
>           create a way!)

What is this "extended RDF"?  I'm not even sure I can guess what it is.

> it used to be. THe best actions to create a Semantic Web IMO are (based on
> Tim's ramblings):-
>
>      1. Create XML to RDF extraction tools.

Happenning all the while.  Examples include Jonathan Borden's work, and
that of Dan Connolly, who even has a system for extracting RDF from
RFC822.  There is much knowledge staggering about the ether in RFC822.

>      2. Create notepad databases of RDF

Can you explain this?

>      3. Link ontologies to real world problems

This should be a fundamental requirement of any ontological engagement.  I
haven't heard of efforts that don't meet this.

>      4. Create GUIs for the RDF model

See the work of Dan Brickley and others.  One of my Fourthought colleagues
is doing some work in this field as well.

>      5. Stop moaning about it and get to work!

Well, from your 1, 3 and 4, I'd have to conclude that the semantic Web is
well on the way, but I think your list is not exhaustive.


-- 
Uche Ogbuji                               Principal Consultant
uche.ogbuji@f...               +1 303 583 9900 x 101
Fourthought, Inc.                         http://Fourthought.com
4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA
Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python


PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!

Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
Email
First Name
Last Name
Company
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3
 

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.


Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.