[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

RE: "RDF + Topic Maps" = The Future

• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 15:13:45 -0600

Then what you want is groves.

Len 
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Eric van der Vlist [mailto:vdv@d...]

"Bullard, Claude L (Len)" wrote:
> 
> Topic Maps are following a path laid
> out by its inventors before RDF existed.
> So, cat out of hat but don't blame the
> cat for that.
> 

I am not blaming anyone --sorry if I gave this impression.

I also wonder if the syntax (RDF, extended XLinks or XTM) is that
important...

The syntax does have an impact on which serialization and
deserialization tools will be used, but the data model is, IMHO, what
really counts.

• Prev by Date: Re: "RDF + Topic Maps" = The Future
• Next by Date: RE: What is XP?
• Previous by thread: Re: "RDF + Topic Maps" = The Future
• Next by thread: RE: "RDF + Topic Maps" = The Future
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread