[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: simple question on namespaces. (more arguing)

• From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>
• To: Mike Brown <mbrown@c...>, xml-dev@l...
• Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2000 16:54:38 -0500

Mike Brown wrote:

>
> Well there are many other examples of syntax rules for values that are
> supposed to be unique, and each ruleset is tailored for generating IDs
> suited for a certain purpose. For example, there are competing syntax
rules
> for:
>    - the values of ID-type attributes in XML documents

These expand into URIs per the XPointer specification.

>    - Message-ID values in email headers

These are URIs using the mid: scheme

>    - language 'tags' like fr-CA and x-klingon

???
>    - the name or location of a resource -- a URI
>
> I do not see a good reason that URI syntax had to be the basis for
> identifying namespaces. It should not be a surprise that confusion ensues
> from this choice, since URIs were designed for a different purpose. They
are
> *not* generic identifiers; they are intended to be used to identify the
> names and locations of resources. Whether the location or resource exists
> and/or is accessible is irrelevant, as has been mentioned repeatedly. But
> that doesn't change the fact that the URI identifies a location. Come on,
is
> something so abstract as a namespace really a *resource* that can have a
> *location*?

yep.

A URI reference precisely identifies a location within the abstract URI
space. A namespace name is no more, nor less, abstract than a URI reference.

Jonathan Borden
The Open Healthcare Group
http://www.openhealth.org

• References:
  • RE: simple question on namespaces. (more arguing)
    • From: Mike Brown <mbrown@c...>

• Prev by Date: ?[xsd:schemaLocation equivalentTo src] was Re: Bring back src?
• Next by Date: Re: Tool X (was Re: simple question on namespaces.)
• Previous by thread: RE: simple question on namespaces. (more arguing)
• Next by thread: XLang
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread