[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Why not canonical parsers? [Was: Pull-based XML parsers? ]
At 07:49 AM 11/10/00 -0800, Tim Bray wrote: >Wow... Canonical XML is pretty easy to generate, but I'd think >that enforcing all those constraints would be a lot of work, >i.e. probably more than parsing ordinary XML. -Tim Enforcing which constraints? It seems like reading Canonical XML just requires a namespace-aware parser for UTF-8 documents, with no need to implement DTD support. Am I missing something drastic? I can see where creating canonical documents from regular XML might be difficult, but I don't see much difficulty in reading them. Simon St.Laurent XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed. XHTML: Migrating Toward XML http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|